Monday, August 30, 2010

Article: The right-wing cure for human misery: More pain - How the World Works - Salon.com

The right-wing cure for human misery: More pain - How the World Works - Salon.com
http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/08/30/robert_barro_on_unemployment

The primary factor behind the 1982 recession was Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker's decision to raise interest rates enormously high, as part of his war against inflation. In other words, it was a completely different animal compared to the current downturn, which was precipitated by a financial crisis and a housing bust greater than anything the United States has experienced since the 1930s. A crisis that is still ongoing.

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Sunday, August 29, 2010

Article: Fire at Tenn. Mosque Building Site Ruled Arson - CBS News

Fire at Tenn. Mosque Building Site Ruled Arson - CBS News
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/08/28/national/main6814690.shtml

"No mosque in Murfreesboro. I don't want it. I don't want them here," Evy Summers said to WTVF. "Go start their own country overseas somewhere. This is a Christian country. It was based on Christianity."

Friday, August 27, 2010

Article: Ground Zero's Slave Graves | Mother Jones

Ground Zero's Slave Graves | Mother Jones
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/08/ground-zero-was-built-graves-slaves

Before the World Trade Center was even designed (with Islamic architectural elements, incidentally), the ground was indeed sacrosanct: The bones of some 20,000 African slaves are buried 25 feet below Lower Manhattan.

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Article: Deregulation, Market Concentration at the Root of Egg Recall

Deregulation, Market Concentration at the Root of Egg Recall
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/08/25/deregulation-market-concentration-at-the-root-of-egg-recall/

There are a number of ways to contain this problem but they all involve government actually fulfilling its role of promoting the general welfare.

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Article: US Drone Strike Destroys House Full of Children in Pakistan -- News from Antiwar.com

US Drone Strike Destroys House Full of Children in Pakistan -- News from Antiwar.com
http://news.antiwar.com/2010/08/23/us-drone-strike-destroys-house-full-of-children-in-pakistan/

The large numbers of civilians (700 in 2009 alone) killed in the US drone strikes has fueled considerable anti-American sentiment in Pakistan. When pressed during a previous visit Secretary of State Hillary Clinton shrugged off concerns about the civilians, saying only "there's a war going on."

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

What political courage looks like

"made clear that Park 51 has the absolute constitutional right to build a community center in Lower Manhattan, and refused even to acknowledge the toxic notion that Muslims generally somehow bear responsibility for the 9/11 attack."

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Robert Gibbs attacks the fringe losers of the left

 
 

Sent to you by brine via Google Reader:

 
 

via Glenn Greenwald by Glenn Greenwald on 8/10/10

(updated below - Update II - Update III)

You may think that the reason you're dissatisfied with the Obama administration is because of substantive objections to their policies:  that they've done so little about crisis-level unemployment, foreclosures and widespread economic misery.  Or because of the White House's apparently endless devotion to Wall Street.  Or because the President has escalated a miserable, pointless and unwinnable war that is entering its ninth year.  Or because he has claimed the power to imprison people for life with no charges and to assassinate American citizens without due process, intensified the secrecy weapons and immunity instruments abused by his predecessor, and found all new ways of denying habeas corpus.  Or because he granted full-scale legal immunity to those who committed serious crimes in the last administration.  Or because he's failed to fulfill -- or affirmatively broken -- promises ranging from transparency to gay rights.

But Robert Gibbs -- in one of the most petulant, self-pitying outbursts seen from a top political official in recent memory, half derived from a paranoid Richard Nixon rant and the other half from a Sean Hannity/Sarah Palin caricature of The Far Left -- is here to tell you that the real reason you're dissatisfied with the President is because you're a fringe, ideological, Leftist extremist ingrate who needs drug counseling:

The White House is simmering with anger at criticism from liberals who say President Obama is more concerned with deal-making than ideological purity.

During an interview with The Hill in his West Wing office, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs blasted liberal naysayers, whom he said would never regard anything the president did as good enough.

"I hear these people saying he's like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested," Gibbs said. "I mean, it's crazy."

The press secretary dismissed the "professional left" in terms very similar to those used by their opponents on the ideological right, saying, "They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we've eliminated the Pentagon. That's not reality."

Of those who complain that Obama caved to centrists on issues such as healthcare reform, Gibbs said: "They wouldn't be satisfied if Dennis Kucinich was president."

The White House, constantly under fire from expected enemies on the right, has been frustrated by nightly attacks on cable news shows catering to the left, where Obama and top lieutenants like Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel have been excoriated for abandoning the public option in healthcare reform; for not moving faster to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay; and for failing, so far, to end the ban on gays serving openly in the military. . . .

Gibbs said the professional left is not representative of the progressives who organized, campaigned, raised money and ultimately voted for Obama.

Progressives, Gibbs said, are the liberals outside of Washington "in America," and they are grateful for what Obama has accomplished in a shattered economy with uniform Republican opposition and a short amount of time.

So, to recap:  (1) The Professional Left are totally irrelevant losers who speak for absolutely nobody, and certainly nobody in Real America who matters; but (2) they're ruining everything for the White House!!!  And:  if you criticize the President, it's only because you're such a rabid extremist that you harbor a secret desire to eliminate the Pentagon -- that's how anti-American you are!  You're such a Far Left extremist that Dennis Kucinich isn't far enough Left for you, you subversive, drug-using hippies!  You're so far to the Left that you want to turn the U.S. into Canada.  As David Frum put it today:  "More proof of my longtime thesis, Repub pols fear the GOP base; Dem pols hate the Dem base." 

The Democrats have been concerned about a lack of enthusiasm on the part of their base headed into the midterm elections.  These sorts of rabid, caricatured, Fox-News-copying attacks on the Left will undoubtedly help generate more enthusiasm -- more loud clapping -- for the Democrats.  I know I'm eager to go canvass and clap for Democrats after reading Gibbs' noble, inspiring vision.  If it were Gibbs' goal to be as petulant and self-pitying as possible, what could he have done differently?

Perhaps one day the White House can work itself up to express this sort of sputtering rage against the Right, or the Wall Street thieves who destroyed the American economy, or the permanent factions that control Washington.  Until then, we'll have to satisfy ourselves with White House explanations that the Real Culprits are not (of course) them, but the Professional Left, that is simultaneously totally irrelevant and ruining everything.  I'll give credit to Gibbs for putting his name on this outburst:  these are usually the things they say anonymously and then deny afterward on the record that it's what they think.

 

UPDATE:  On September 9, 2008 -- roughly two months before the election -- Barack Obama addressed a large, enthusiastic crowd and said:  "As president, I will lead a new era of accountability in education. But see, I don't just want to hold our teachers accountable; I want to hold our government accountable. I want you to hold me accountable."  In 20 short months, we've gone from "hold me accountable" to "get drug tested," you wretched ingrates.

 

UPDATE II:  Robert Gibbs:  

I hear these people saying he's like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested. I mean, it's crazy.

TPM:

Electronic Frontier Foundation:

 

Charlie Savage, The New York Times:

Bob Herbert, The New York Times:

Anthony Romero:

The Hill:

NYT Editorial Page:

I hope there are enough drug testing facilities to accommodate Talking Points Memo reporters, Charlie Savage, the lawyers from EFF, Bob Herbert, Anthony Romero, Russ Feingold, and The New York Times Editorial Board.  I don't know anyone who asserts that Obama is the same as Bush -- I don't believe that and never asserted that -- but if anyone needs to be "drug tested," it would be those denying that many of Bush's most controversial policies and actions have been embraced in full by Barack Obama.

 

UPDATE III:  Gibbs has now issued a statement trying to walk back his comments, invoking the Beltway cliché to do so:  "what I may have said inartfully."  Aside from how incoherent his explanation is for why he said what he said -- see here -- I want to focus on his closing paragraph:

So we should all, me included, stop fighting each other and arguing about our differences on certain policies, and instead work together to make sure everyone knows what is at stake because we've come too far to turn back now.

In other words:  we should all stop criticizing the administration when it does things we think are bad, destructive and wrong, and instead dutifully place our allegiance to Party above all else by loyally and quietly working to elect more Democrats.  Sorry:  that's not going to happen.  I vastly prefer the model of citizenship outlined by a Senator named Barack Obama in his 2005 Daily Kos diary:

In that spirit, let me end by saying I don't pretend to have all the answers to the challenges we face, and I look forward to periodic conversations with all of you in the months and years to come. I trust that you will continue to let me and other Democrats know when you believe we are screwing up.  And I, in turn, will always try and show you the respect and candor one owes his friends and allies.

Being a rational, engaged citizen means objecting when political leaders do things that you think are wrong or bad and praising them when they do things you think are good and constructive.  That even includes President Obama.  It's just that simple, and pointing to Scary John Boehner hovering in the corner in order to ratchet up fear levels isn't going to change that, nor should it.  Barack Obama is President of the U.S. at least until January, 2013, and wields vast power.  It's therefore vital that he, like any other political official, be held accountable for the bad actions he undertakes -- just as he himself always argued.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Scientists Allege Federal Gov’t Tried to Muffle Plume Findings

 
 

Sent to you by brine via Google Reader:

 
 


by Marian Wang

When news first spread about the huge plumes of dispersed oil discovered by scientists in the deep waters of the Gulf, the federal government's reaction was to criticize the media's reporting. Here's the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on May 17: 

Media reports related to the research work conducted aboard the R/V Pelican included information that was misleading, premature and, in some cases, inaccurate.

Now, scientists behind some of the plume research have spoken out about what went on behind the scenes with the federal agencies that sponsored their research. The St. Petersburg Times relays this from one scientist at the University of South Florida:

"I got lambasted by the Coast Guard and NOAA when we said there was undersea oil," USF marine sciences dean William Hogarth said. Some officials even told him to retract USF's public announcement, he said, comparing it to being "beat up" by federal officials.

Scientists on another team, from another university, had a similar experience when they reported their plume findings.

"We expected that NOAA would be pleased because we found something very, very interesting," Vernon Asper, an oceanographer at the University of Southern Mississippi, told the Times. "NOAA instead responded by trying to discredit us. It was just a shock to us. … [NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco] basically called us inept idiots."

The Coast Guard did not comment, but Lubchenco told the Times, "What we asked for, was for people to stop speculating before they had a chance to analyze what they were finding." She also said that her agency was working smoothly with these universities to better understand the after-effects and long-term impact of the spill. (NOAA confirmed the existence of plumes about a month later.)

Scientists, however, say that they're still waiting for NOAA to either give them a shared analysis or return the oil plume samples, which were taken for use "in an eventual court case against BP and other oil companies involved in the disaster," the Times reported. A NOAA scientist said he was "sure we will release the data" at some point, but that he is "not sure where they are" because so much sampling has been done.

The messages from scientists and the government continued to differ in recent weeks.

The Food and Drug Administration has continued to assure American consumers that Gulf seafood caught within reopened fishing areas is being tested and is safe.

Meanwhile, an Associated Press story published today cites several scientists analyzing oil-contaminated crab larvae. It's unclear from the report where exactly the larvae were found—and whether that area was open or closed to fishing at the time—but the scientists said their findings provided evidence that oil was  entering the Gulf food chain and could have long-term effects on marine life and seafood.

In recent weeks, many scientists have also criticized or expressed skepticism about a rosy report from NOAA announcing that most of the oil BP spilled into the Gulf is gone. A quick compilation of reactions:            

"These are just what we call WAGs — wild-a-- guesses," Rick Steiner a retired University of Alaska professor, told the Times.

"I'm suspect if that's accurate or not," Ronald Kendall, director of the Institute of Environmental and Human Health at Texas Tech University, told McClatchy Newspapers.

"There is a lot of uncertainty in these figures," Lousiana State University professor James H. Cowan Jr. told McClatchy.

"If an academic scientist put something like this out there, it would get torpedoed into a billion pieces," Samantha Joye of the University of Georgia, a leading scientist on this spill, told The New York Times.

"This is a shaky report. The more I read it, the less satisfied I am with the thoroughness of the presentation. … There's some science here, but mostly, it's spin," Florida State University professor Ian MacDonald told The Associated Press.

Some in the scientific community did find the report plausible. Louisiana State University emeritus professor Ed Overton peer-reviewed the report and told the AP he thought it was mostly good work, though he was uncomfortable with the precise percentages about the amount of oil left in the Gulf. And Jeffrey Short, a former federal scientist who works with the environmental group Oceana, told The New York Times that the estimates "are better than nothing, and probably not very far off."


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Saturday, August 7, 2010

WikiLeaks Interview: 'We Will Keep Publishing Documents'

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/07/wikileaks-interview-we-wi_n_674457.html# (via shareaholic.com)

That request remains open. However, the Pentagon has stated that it is not interested in 'harm minimization' and has not contacted us, directly, or indirectly to discuss this offer

Twitter / WikiLeaks: Obnoxious Pentagon spokesp ...

Link: http://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/20411933104 (via shareaholic.com)

Obnoxious Pentagon spokesperson issues formal threat against WikiLeaks: Destroy everything, or else http://cs.pn/aOxf0Y

Consistency

 
 

Sent to you by brine via Google Reader:

 
 

via Matthew Yglesias by myglesias on 8/7/10

Republicans who've availed themselves of lame duck sessions of congress before are now loudly objecting to the idea of Democrats holding a lame duck session. This is often described as "hypocrisy" but I actually think it isn't.

Something I really like and respect about Republican members of congress is that on issues of political process they maintain an admirable level of consistency. Their view is something like "one should do whatever one can within the bounds of the law to ensure that the right substantive outcome happens." So if holding a lame duck session produces more conservative policy, they hold one. But if stigmatizing a lame duck session would block progressive policy, they stigmatize. It seems to me that this is how politics ought to be done. No country has competing political coalitions organized around rival views of process issues, they're organized around rival views of important questions of substance. One problem with the structure of American politics is that we only have one team that plays this way. But the fault for that lies with the Democrats, who it seems to me have a tendency to not take their own jobs and ideas seriously, rather than with Republicans.

Politics in a democracy isn't a blood sport. We don't kill members of the other side or intimidate them with violence. But it's not a parlor game either. It's serious stuff, and it deserves to be taken seriously. Republicans do a good job of that, and their approach to process "hypocrisy" merely reflects the fact that they have a reasonable sense of priorities.


 
 

Things you can do from here:

 
 

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Article: Charging the WikiLeaks leaker with treason would be absurd. - By Fred Kaplan - Slate Magazine

Charging the WikiLeaks leaker with treason would be absurd. - By Fred Kaplan - Slate Magazine
http://www.slate.com/id/2262801/

Instead of loosely tossing around words like treason, Congress should maybe think about crafting a tighter, more sensible law.

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Michael Hastings' embed permission is revoked - Glenn Greenwald


".. the revelation last year that the Pentagon was paying a private contractor to rate the favorability of war coverage of various journalists to determine embed applications — to which the new public affairs officer was responding when he vowed at his hearing to "ensure that journalists are not being denied embeds with combat troops based on the tenor of their reporting."

Defining Prosperity Down - NYTimes.com


Not long ago, anyone predicting that one in six American workers would soon be unemployed or underemployed, and that the average unemployed worker would have been jobless for 35 weeks, would have been dismissed as outlandishly pessimistic — in part because if anything like that happened, policy makers would surely be pulling out all the stops on behalf of job creation.

Article: New Flow Rate Estimates Match an Earlier, Unpublicized Number Used by BP - ProPublica

New Flow Rate Estimates Match an Earlier, Unpublicized Number Used by BP - ProPublica
http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/new-flow-rate-estimates-match-earlier-number-used-by-bp

BP's well spewed about 4.9 million barrels—more than 200 million gallons of crude—before it was temporarily capped. Only about 800,000 barrels—about 16 percent—was captured

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Article: ACLU, CCR seek to have Obama enjoined from killing Awlaki without due process - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

ACLU, CCR seek to have Obama enjoined from killing Awlaki without due process - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/08/03/awlaki/index.html

Early last month, the ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights were retained by Nasser al-Awlaki, the father of Obama assassination target (and U.S. citizen) Anwar al-Awlaki, to seek a federal court order restraining the Obama administration from killing his son without due process of law.

Monday, August 2, 2010

Article: Project Vigilant and the government/corporate destruction of privacy - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

Project Vigilant and the government/corporate destruction of privacy - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/08/02/privacy/index.html

Project Vigilant is funded by BBHC Global, an information security firm based in the Midwest, and private donations. Uber's boss is Steven Ruhe, the Managing Member of BBHC Global. "I've always been a small town guy with big dreams," said Ruhe who was born and raised in Nebraska and sells Amway products on the side. "This work is for a really good cause."

(another Amway link in the American privatized national security / military industry.. Erik prince, CEO of blackwater's family has a strong alliance with the DuVoss (sp?) family who founded the away business.  Super powerful political lobby in the region around the carolinas.. I wonder if this guy is another privileged family friend or just a rally-attendee-seller-type..)

Article: AFP: British campaigners in legal bid after US file leak

AFP: British campaigners in legal bid after US file leak
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hdpLTnsQxGHS9FA-BEqvEZU_NhEg

The campaigners say shooting deaths revealed in the files "require to be investigated as suspected war crimes".

(via Instapaper)



▓▒░

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Huffington Post: Dutch Withdraw From Afghanistan

 

A Nato request that the Netherlands extend its deployment helped precipitate the collapse of the country's coalition government in February.


Huffington Post: Los Angeles Pushing To Become Nation's Mass Transit Leader

 
The projects include a long-awaited subway extension to the economically vibrant west side of Los Angeles (a plan often called the Subway to the Sea), a regional connector linking three rail lines in the downtown core, plus light rail extensions reaching Los Angeles International Airport and communities to the south and east. In all, completion of these projects would add 78 miles of rail and bus-only lanes to the current, 102-mile system and 77 million annual transit boardings to the MTA's current 445 million.